Filing Multiple Models: Qualification Criteria for Medical Device Grouping
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
The Philippines has released a draft of the Guidelines on the Qualification Criteria for Grouping of Medical Devices in Product Registration for public comment. The draft would allow several devices to be combined into a single registration application where they share the same product owner, the same risk class, the same brand name, a common intended use, and a common design and manufacturing process. As of the verification date the guideline remains at the consultation stage and has not entered into force, so current CDRRHR practice continues to govern.
- The document is still a Draft for Comments, not an issued circular. It cannot be relied on as a basis for commitments to clients or to management.
- The eligibility test is cumulative: same owner, same risk class, same brand name, common intended use, common design and manufacturing process.
- IVDs are outside the scope of the draft, consistent with the way AO No. 2018-0002 and FC No. 2022-008 treat IVDs.
- Kits and reagent kits containing medicinal products, medicinal boxes containing devices, and device-medicinal combination products are excluded.
- Budget and schedule should still be built on one application per model until the guideline is formally issued and its transition arrangements are known.
2. Legal basis
The draft is titled Guidelines on the Qualification Criteria for Grouping of Medical Devices in Product Registration and remains a Draft for Comments as of 27 October 2026. Its parent provisions are Section 10(g)(1) of RA No. 3720 as amended by RA No. 9711, which defines a medical device, together with Section VII.E item 11, and Section VII.A items 2.c and 2.f, of Book I of the RA No. 9711 Implementing Rules and Regulations. The scope covers manufacturers, traders and distributors, including importers, exporters and wholesalers, who apply for product registration, and expressly does not cover IVDs. The operative administrative order today remains AO No. 2018-0002 of 26 January 2018.
| Document | Guidelines on the Qualification Criteria for Grouping of Medical Devices in Product Registration |
| Status | Draft for Comments; not formally issued as of 27 October 2026 |
| Parent provisions | RA No. 3720 as amended by RA No. 9711, Section 10(g)(1) (device definition); RA No. 9711 IRR Book I, Section VII.E item 11, and Section VII.A items 2.c and 2.f |
| Scope | Manufacturers, traders and distributors (importer, exporter, wholesaler) applying for product registration; not applicable to IVDs |
| Exclusions | Kits or reagent kits containing medicinal products; medicinal boxes containing devices; device-medicinal combination products |
| Grouping conditions (draft definition) | Family members must come from the same product owner, share the same risk classification, the same brand name, a common intended use, and a common design and manufacturing process |
| Administrative order in force | AO No. 2018-0002 (26 January 2018) |
3. Expert insights
Once the grouping rule lands, it will change the cost structure of multi-model portfolios. In a market without grouping, every model needs its own application, its own fee and its own maintenance. A grouping rule allows models that meet the family definition to be merged into one registration application, which reduces official fees, dossier volume and the ongoing cost of maintaining the registrations. For manufacturers with broad product lines, such as imaging systems, monitoring devices or consumable ranges, this is a material benefit rather than a procedural convenience.
Of the five draft conditions, common design and manufacturing process is the hardest to satisfy. Same owner, same risk class, same brand name and common intended use are relatively straightforward to demonstrate. Common design and manufacturing process requires that the differences between models do not touch the design principle or the manufacturing flow. Differences in appearance or dimensions will usually qualify; differences in working principle, in critical components or in process flow mean the models are not in the same family, however similar they look on a price list.
IVDs are expressly outside the grouping rule. The draft states that the circular applies to manufacturers, traders and distributors applying for product registration, excluding in vitro diagnostic medical devices. This mirrors the consistent treatment of IVDs in AO No. 2018-0002 and FC No. 2022-008. IVDs in the Philippines continue to run on a separate track, and an IVD portfolio should be planned without any assumption of grouping relief.
At draft stage, do not make commitments on the basis of the rule. GRZAN’s position is that the grouping rule deserves attention and advance preparation, but project schedules and budgets should still be estimated on the current one-model-one-application basis. There are two reasons. The draft may be modified before issuance, and even once issued it would normally carry a transition period. Preparing product files in family logic is worthwhile groundwork; promising a client that fewer applications will be needed is not, until the text is final.
4. Practical recommendations
- Organise product files in family logic now. Group every model against the five criteria of owner, risk class, brand, intended use and design and manufacturing process, and produce a family list that can be applied the moment the rule takes effect.
- Confirm current practice separately before filing. Ask CDRRHR whether grouped filing is being accepted and on what conditions, and keep the written answer with the project file.
- Do not widen the filing scope in order to create a grouping. Forcing models that do not share a common design and process into one application risks the return of the entire application, including the models that would otherwise have passed.
- Plan IVD lines separately. The grouping rule does not apply, so IVD timelines and fees should continue to be built on individual applications.
- Watch the transition arrangements. When the guideline is issued, check whether applications already in the queue can be regrouped, because that determines whether waiting is worthwhile.
5. Verification checklist
- □ Formal status of the grouping guideline checked on the FDA website (Draft for Comments or issued circular).
- □ Five family conditions verified: owner, risk class, brand, intended use, design and process.
- □ IVD status confirmed as excluded (draft Section III).
- □ Combination product status confirmed: medicated kits, medicinal boxes and device-drug combinations are excluded.
- □ Current CDRRHR position obtained in writing before any grouped filing.
- □ Budget still estimated on one application per model.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support across Southeast Asia, including the Philippines. Our team prepares CMDN/CMDR dossiers to ASEAN CSDT structure, manages submissions and deficiency responses with the FDA Philippines, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us