IVD Performance Evaluation Report in India: Three Batch Requirement
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
India requires a performance evaluation report (PER) for Class B, C, and D IVDs, and the report must cover three independent batches, produced from three different lots of critical raw materials such as antigens or antibodies. Testing may be carried out at the Central Medical Device Testing Laboratory, at a laboratory registered with the CLA, or at a government laboratory, national-level hospital, or NABL-accredited laboratory meeting the specifications in CLA guidance.
- Three batches means three independent production runs, each traceable to a different lot of critical raw material.
- The requirement is a production planning constraint, not merely a documentation exercise.
- The range of acceptable testing laboratories is wider than the central laboratory alone, but each alternative must follow CLA specifications.
- Sample size must be statistically significant under a protocol designed and approved by the central laboratory.
- For HIV, HBsAg, and HCV, the CDSCO states explicit sensitivity and specificity thresholds.
2. Legal basis
The requirements are set out in the CDSCO’s IVD frequently asked questions, which function as detailed operational guidance. The table below sets out each item, the question in which it appears, and its content.
| Three-batch requirement | CDSCO IVD FAQ question 66 | The applicant must submit a performance evaluation report for three independent batches of the IVD, produced using three different lots of critical raw materials such as antigens or antibodies |
| Alternative laboratories | Same document, question 67 | Where the Central Medical Device Testing Laboratory or a CLA-registered laboratory cannot perform the testing, it may be carried out at a government laboratory, national-level hospital, or NABL-accredited laboratory, and the report must meet the specification standards in the guidance issued by the CLA |
| Sample size | Same document, question 71 | Sample size must be statistically significant under a protocol designed and approved by the respective Central Medical Device Testing Laboratory |
| Report structure and content | Same document, question 73 | Must include product name, batch number, date of manufacture, expiry date, manufacturer name, importer name, number of samples tested, principle of the test, reference materials used, test procedure, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, report number, date of analysis, and the designation and signature of the analyst and the authorised signatory |
| HIV, HBsAg, and HCV criteria | Same document, question 70 | Anti-HIV sensitivity 100%, specificity at least 98%; HBsAg sensitivity 100%, specificity at least 98%; HCV rapid tests sensitivity at least 99%, specificity at least 98% |
| Test licence fee | Same document, question 76 | Import test licence USD 100 |
3. Expert insights
Insight one: three batches from three raw material lots is a production planning problem, not a documentation problem. It requires the manufacturer to arrange, before submitting the application, that three different lots of critical raw materials are put into production and sent for testing. The rule pushes the starting point of an IVD project back into the manufacturing function, and it is the first scheduling constraint on every IVD project. A plan that begins with dossier writing will inevitably discover this constraint late.
Insight two: the CDSCO even specifies the acceptance criteria. HIV and HBsAg rapid tests require 100 percent sensitivity, HCV rapid tests require at least 99 percent, and specificity is uniformly at least 98 percent. These are hard thresholds, and failure means rejection. Publishing performance thresholds inside an FAQ is unusual in other markets, and it has one practical benefit: the acceptance bar is knowable in advance rather than negotiated during review.
Insight three: the PER report format is also standardised. Question 73 lists, item by item, the fields that the report must contain. Writing to this list can remove one full round of correction. It also gives the testing laboratory a specification to work against, which is more reliable than asking the laboratory to produce a report in its own house format and then translating it afterwards.
Insight four: pre-import samples can enter under a test licence. The three batches of samples may be imported under a test licence through Form MD-16 and MD-17, at a fee of USD 100 for Class A, B, C, and D alike, for non-commercial purposes. This is the mechanism that allows testing in India without a full import licence, and it should be planned as a separate logistics workstream with its own documentation.
4. Practical recommendations
The first action GRZAN takes on an IVD project is production scheduling, not document writing. Together with the client’s manufacturing department, we confirm the arrival and production dates of the three lots of critical raw materials, work backwards to the testing and report issuance dates, and then backwards again to the submission date. We also draft the report template according to the field list in question 73 and hand it to the laboratory before testing begins — getting the laboratory to issue the report in the Indian format is far more reliable than translating and reorganising it afterwards.
- Schedule three independent batches against three different critical raw material lots before any dossier work starts.
- Confirm the chosen laboratory falls within the accepted categories and follows CLA specifications.
- Provide the laboratory with the question 73 field list as a report template in advance.
- Verify sensitivity and specificity against the question 70 thresholds before shipping samples.
- Plan the MD-16 to MD-17 test licence route for sample import and budget the USD 100 fee.
5. Verification checklist
- □ Three independent batches have been scheduled, using three different lots of critical raw materials
- □ The testing laboratory is the Central Medical Device Testing Laboratory, a CLA-registered laboratory, or a government or NABL-accredited laboratory
- □ The report has been drafted according to the question 73 field list
- □ Sensitivity and specificity for HIV, HBsAg, and HCV products meet the question 70 criteria
- □ Sample import has been arranged under the MD-16 to MD-17 test licence at USD 100
Regulatory information verified as of 27 October 2026.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support across South Asia, including India. Our team prepares dossiers to CDSCO expectations, manages SUGAM submissions and deficiency responses, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us