Ecuador Medical Device Technical Dossier: The Article 24 Type and Risk-Class Matrix
Updated: 2026-11-12 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
Article 24 is the core provision of the Ecuadorian technical dossier. It applies its requirements through a two-dimensional matrix of device type multiplied by risk class. Four items are mandatory for every type and every class: the description and interpretation of the batch number or serial number, the label draft, the instructions for use or user manual, and the manufacturing process information including a flow chart. Biocompatibility studies apply only to class III and IV invasive devices (DMI) — the requirement most likely to be overestimated by companies preparing for this revision.
The practical estimate used by GRZAN is that a project team that first fixes the type code and the risk class, and only then reads the matrix row by row, will assemble a materially leaner dossier than one that copies a generic checklist. Over-preparing studies that the matrix does not require wastes budget, while missing one of the four all-class items guarantees a correction request during the completeness review.
2. Legal basis
| Regulation | Number | Date | Provision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative Technical Health Regulation for the Sanitary Registration, Control and Surveillance of Medical Devices for Human Use | Resolución ARCSA-DE-2026-003-DASP | Signed 2026-04-28 | Article 24 (technical file, 2 major groups, 16 items) |
| Same regulation | Same number | Same date | Article 21 (types and classes) and Article 12 (language and signature) |
| Same regulation | Same number | Same date | Article 20 (sources of normative documents) |
Structure of Article 24: the first major group covers the requirements that demonstrate the quality of the finished product (items 1.1 to 1.9); the second major group covers the requirements that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the finished product, as applicable (items 2.1 to 2.7). Article 21 defines the type codes DMA, DMI, DMNI and DMDIV and the risk classes I to IV; Article 12 requires the technical file in Spanish or English with a list electronically signed by the Ecuadorian technical responsible person.
3. Expert insights
Insight one: the matrix logic is dual — type and class — not class alone. The same data item may apply differently to invasive devices (DMI) and active devices (DMA). For example, the description of raw materials or materials applies to DMNI, DMI and DMDIV in all classes, but for DMA it applies only to therapeutic devices, in all classes. When assembling the dossier, the type code must be fixed first and the class consulted second; both steps are indispensable.
Insight two: the four all-class mandatory items form the skeleton of the package.
- Item 1.1, description and interpretation of the batch number or serial number — the text marks it as mandatory for all devices in all risk classes;
- Item 1.2, the label draft — it must be a PDF, not a photocopy, an image or a scan, and must state the information required by Article 49;
- Item 1.3, the instructions for use or user manual — it must be written in Spanish, and may additionally contain other languages;
- Item 1.8, manufacturing process information — it must include a flow chart of the production process.
Insight three: the biocompatibility requirement of Article 24 is much narrower than the industry expected. Item 2.1 provides that biocompatibility studies based on the ISO 10993 standards apply only to class III and IV DMI. This means that non-invasive devices, active devices and in vitro diagnostics do not trigger this mandatory requirement at all.
Insight four: the biofunctional studies of item 2.2 target implantable devices. The text requires biofunctional studies based on scientific evidence, together with functional performance testing demonstrating that the device achieves its clinical purpose safely and effectively, only for class III and IV implantable DMI. Implantability is the implicit qualifier of this item.
Insight five: item 2.3 brings software within the scope of clinical evaluation. The text refers to clinical studies, or a SaMD clinical evaluation of the medical technology of the device, applicable to class III and IV DMI, DMA and DMDIV. Note that non-invasive devices (DMNI) are outside the scope of this item.
Insight six: Article 24 reserves an offline channel for oversized files. Where the system cannot upload the material because of storage capacity, the documentation must be submitted by official letter (oficio) with a magnetic medium (CD) or other electronic means to the ARCSA zonal coordination office or headquarters, and the number of the oficio must be stated in the application submitted through the VUE system.
Insight seven: the applicant may proactively submit additional information. Where the applicant holds device-relevant information beyond the listed items, it may optionally include it in the registration application. This gives companies holding stronger evidence a route to a more robust file.
4. Practical recommendations
- Fix the type code before consulting the class: work through the DMA, DMI, DMNI and DMDIV codes with classes I to IV cell by cell and derive the project-specific document list from the matrix.
- Do not spend money on items the matrix does not trigger: non-implantable products do not need a full biocompatibility package prepared by habit.
- Output the label draft strictly as a native PDF, never as a scan or an image, to avoid a formal correction.
- The instructions for use must be in Spanish: an English-only manual is acceptable only in the additional-language position, never as the sole version.
- Plan the oficio channel for oversized files early: confirm the receiving zonal coordination office and preserve the oficio number for entry into the VUE application.
5. Verification checklist
- □ The type code (DMA, DMI, DMNI or DMDIV) and risk class of every product have been determined.
- □ The applicable items have been ticked against the Article 24 matrix for this project.
- □ The four all-class mandatory items are complete.
- □ The label draft is a native PDF, not a scan or an image.
- □ The instructions for use have been written in Spanish.
- □ The manufacturing process information includes a flow chart.
- □ The oficio submission channel and the number back-entry method for oversized files have been confirmed.
Regulatory information verified as of October 29, 2026
GRZAN supports manufacturers, importers and authorised representatives assembling Ecuadorian technical dossiers under the Article 24 type and risk-class matrix, from matrix mapping and mandatory-item checks to oversized-file oficio handling. For tailored assistance with your Ecuador medical device registration, contact us at info@grzanglobal.com.
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us