Key Clause Design for Agency Agreements and Letters of Authorisation

Updated: 2026-11-12 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20

1. Key takeaways

The agency agreement and the letters of authorisation (LoA / PoA) used in Jordan must resolve one core issue: the registration certificate belongs to the AR, not to the manufacturer. GRZAN’s conclusion is that this ownership structure shifts the design focus of the agreement away from commercial terms and towards control of the registration asset. In practical terms, the agreement is the only instrument that protects the manufacturer’s continued access to its own registration once the commercial relationship changes.

  • Second conclusion: compliance obligations in Jordan cannot be transferred to the AR by agreement so as to exempt the manufacturer. The enforcement path of the JFDA points at both the AR and the manufacturer simultaneously; the agreement can only define the internal allocation of responsibility and cannot be invoked against the regulator.
  • Third conclusion: the agreement must cover five key clause groups — ownership of the registration certificate and its migration; termination triggers and the transition period; the division of vigilance duties; cooperation on change notifications; and exclusivity tied to performance conditions.

2. Legal basis

The design of agency agreements and authorisation documents in Jordan rests on the following instruments.

RegulationReference / numberPublication dateProvision / relevance
Medical Devices Importation Directives (including sterilizers and detergents)Medical Devices Importation Directives Including Sterilizers & DetergentsCurrent version in forceLocal authorised representative designation and authorisation document clauses
Criteria for the Circulation of Medical Devices, Sterilisers and DetergentsCriteria for the Circulation of Medical Devices, Sterilisers and Detergents2019Authorised representative obligation clauses
Drugs and Pharmacies LawLaw No. 122013General provisions on the regulation of health products
JFDA fee scheduleJFDA official fee itemsCurrent version in forceVariation study 25 JOD; certificate issuance 20 JOD

Clause numbers must be verified against the Arabic originals published in the Official Gazette of Jordan and issued by the JFDA; the amounts are the official fees listed in the JFDA fee schedule.

3. Expert insights

Insight 1: ownership of the registration certificate is the clause that most needs negotiating in Jordan. Because the registration dossier is bound to the AR, the certificate formally belongs to the AR. If the manufacturer has not agreed a migration-cooperation clause in the agreement, termination leads to deadlock — the certificate stands in the AR’s name, the manufacturer cannot sell, and the AR has no incentive to cooperate in migrating it. The migration clause is therefore the most valuable piece of leverage the manufacturer will ever hold over the AR, and it can only be obtained before signing.

Insight 2: the termination transition period must cover the certificate migration cycle. Migration involves selecting a new AR, obtaining acceptance for a new warehouse, filing the variation (25 JOD), issuing the certificate (20 JOD), and possibly waiting through review. The transition period should therefore be counted in months rather than in weeks. Planning the transition in weeks creates, in effect, an import stoppage, because no certificate can migrate that quickly.

Insight 3: the response times for vigilance duties should be quantified. The AR carries the duties of post-market surveillance, complaint handling and vigilance activities. The agreement should stipulate the time limit from becoming aware of an adverse event to notifying the manufacturer, the time limit for notifying the JFDA, and the duty to cooperate and the cost sharing for executing field safety corrective actions. Quantified timelines also make a breach observable: a missed working-day deadline is a fact, while a missed promise of promptness is an argument.

Insight 4: the cooperation duty for change notifications must be explicit. Certificate renewal, design changes and label changes on the manufacturer’s side involve variation filings to the JFDA (25 JOD). The agreement should set the AR’s cooperation deadlines so that a delay by the AR does not block the completion of a change. Variation work is unglamorous for a distributor, which is precisely why the deadlines must be contractual.

Insight 5: exclusivity should be bound to performance conditions. Distribution channels in Jordan are fragmented; exclusivity that is not linked to minimum purchase volumes or to market promotion investment easily leads to channel stagnation. GRZAN recommends setting quantified performance clauses and exclusivity termination conditions in the agreement. In a market of this shape, an underperforming exclusive agent blocks better partners as well as sales.

4. Practical recommendations

  • Make the certificate migration clause a mandatory element of the agreement. Specify the post-termination duty to cooperate in migration, the duty to hand over documents, the length of the transition period and the liability for breach. Without this clause, every other protection in the agreement is secondary.
  • Quantify the response times for vigilance and change matters in working days, instead of vague wording such as promptly or as soon as possible.
  • Set performance-linked exclusivity clauses. Specify the minimum purchase volumes, the market promotion investment and the conditions under which exclusivity terminates.
  • Agree the governing law and the dispute resolution mechanism of the agreement in advance. Cross-border agreements should fix the dispute resolution mechanism early to avoid procedural deadlock once a dispute has arisen.

5. Verification checklist

  • □ The agreement states who owns the registration certificate and the post-termination duty to cooperate in migration
  • □ The length of the termination transition period covers the migration and variation filing cycle
  • □ The response times for vigilance duties are quantified across awareness, notification and execution
  • □ The cooperation duty and deadline for change filings are explicit (variation study 25 JOD)
  • □ Exclusivity is tied to minimum purchase volumes and promotion investment, with termination conditions
  • □ The agreement designates the governing law and the dispute resolution mechanism
  • □ The content of the letter of authorisation is consistent with the agreement and consular legalisation is complete
  • □ The cited clause numbers have been re-verified against the Arabic originals of the Official Gazette

How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the Jordanian market. Our team coordinates local importer arrangements, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com

Disclaimer

Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.

About GRZAN

GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.

GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.

Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.

What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.

Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.

Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.

Take your devices global with GRZAN

We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.

Contact us
WhatsApp
QR Code
WhatsApp QR Code
Scan to chat on WhatsApp
Phone
Call
Office Mon-Fri 9:00-18:00
0755-88659477
Mobile 24/7 Service
+86 15816864648
Email
Mail