UK Labelling and Instructions for Use Requirements
Updated: 2026-11-12 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
UK labelling obligations turn on a single dividing line: whether UKCA is affixed. Where UKCA is affixed, the UKRP’s name and address must appear on the product label, the outer packaging or the instructions for use. Where only CE marking is held, the UKRP’s information does not need to appear on the label. Where both CE and UKCA are affixed, the UKRP information must appear. In addition, where a UK conformity assessment body is involved, its number must appear adjacent to the UKCA mark. These four outcomes follow from the marking decision alone, which is why the decision deserves to be treated as a commercial and regulatory choice made deliberately, not as a compliance detail delegated to packaging. Every downstream consequence, label artwork, packaging inventory, IFU versions and DORS data consistency, flows from it. Companies should also remember that the rules operate per device family under the three separate parts of UK MDR 2002, so the analysis must be repeated for general devices, active implantable devices and IVDs rather than assumed company-wide. The sections below trace those consequences through the relevant provisions, explain the language requirement that applies regardless of the marking route, and describe the error-marking provisions that make labelling mistakes a regulatory matter rather than a reprint. Because the trigger is the mark, the marking decision should be recorded per device family and revisited whenever the route into the UK changes.
2. Legal basis
- UK MDR 2002 (SI 2002/618, as amended): reg 10 and reg 10A (marking for general devices and the UK(NI) indication), reg 24 and reg 24A (active implantable devices), reg 36 and reg 36A (IVDs), regs 13/27/40 (the affixing procedures), and Part V reg 50 (incorrect affixing of the body’s number) and reg 51 (incorrect affixing of a UK mark).
- Official guidance: GOV.UK, Regulating medical devices in the UK, including the paragraphs on UKRP labelling requirements.
3. Expert insights
Insight one: the trigger for labelling obligations is the mark, not the pathway. This is the most counter-intuitive feature of the UK labelling rules. A manufacturer using the CE transition route may have appointed a UKRP and completed MHRA registration, yet does not need to print the UKRP on the label, because only CE marking is affixed. Conversely, the moment the decision is made to affix UKCA, a label change becomes necessary at once. GRZAN finds that companies often discover this in reverse, by ordering label artwork before formally deciding the marking strategy. The efficient sequence is the opposite: decide the marking position first, per device family and per market, and let the label requirements follow mechanically from that decision. GRZAN recommends making the UKRP-on-label question a standing item in artwork reviews, so the answer follows the mark automatically rather than depending on individual memory.
Insight two: the language requirement is a hard practical constraint. The official guidance, in the provisions relating to system and procedure packs such as reg 19B(7)(d), explicitly requires English. For the UK market, instructions for use and labelling should be provided in English. This is not satisfied by multilingual artwork that buries the English text, and it applies regardless of which marking route the product uses. Companies shipping into both the EU and GB should plan separate IFU versions rather than attempting one pan-European document, because the language obligations of the two markets no longer align. Translations should be produced and reviewed as controlled documents, with version numbers aligned to the corresponding artwork releases.
Insight three: incorrect marking has dedicated provisions. Part V contains reg 50, on the incorrect affixing of a conformity assessment body’s number, and reg 51, on the incorrect affixing of a UK mark. Together they form the basis for dealing with identification breaches. Labelling errors are therefore not minor matters to be settled by correcting the next production batch; they engage the regulations directly. GRZAN recommends treating any marking discrepancy as a reportable internal quality event with a documented root cause, so that the corrective record exists if the issue is later examined. A documented correction process also protects commercial relationships, since distributors often learn of labelling problems before the manufacturer does.
4. Practical recommendations
GRZAN recommends running a marking decision and label impact assessment before any UK label change begins. The assessment follows four steps in order: determine whether UKCA will be affixed; derive from that whether UKRP information must appear on the label; derive whether a body number must appear adjacent to UKCA; and only then define the scope of the artwork change and the disposition of existing stock. In parallel, the organisation address entered at DORS registration must match exactly what is shown on the label; a mismatch triggers an inconsistency during MHRA data verification of the registration record. GRZAN suggests adding a label-versus-DORS comparison to the pre-release checklist for every new SKU, since the two records are maintained by different teams and drift apart quietly over time. For dual-marked products, GRZAN suggests archiving the approved label artwork alongside the DORS record, so the consistency check has a permanent reference.
5. Verification checklist
- □ Whether UKCA is affixed, alone or as a dual mark, has been confirmed
- □ UKRP information appears on the label where required
- □ The UK conformity assessment body number is marked adjacent to UKCA
- □ Labels and instructions for use are provided in English
- □ The DORS registration address matches the label address
Regulatory information verified as of 29 October 2026.
GRZAN supports manufacturers entering the UK market with the preparation and maintenance of registration documentation and conformity documentation. Our services for the UK market include:
- UK Responsible Person (UKRP) appointment and authorisation letter support
- Full MHRA registration (DORS) filing and account lifecycle management
- Device classification, GMDN code selection and annual registration fee calculation
- Great Britain and Northern Ireland dual-pathway design and UK(NI) solutions
- Post-market surveillance (PMS) system setup, PMSR/PSUR preparation and vigilance reporting
- Serious incident and field safety corrective action (FSCA) emergency response
- UK regulatory change monitoring and compliance gap assessment
For tailored support with UK labelling, instructions for use and conformity documentation, contact GRZAN at info@grzanglobal.com.
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us