Labeling, Instructions for Use and the EAEU Circulation Mark

Updated: 2026-11-12 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20

1. Key takeaways

On the national Russian path, labelling and instructions for use must comply with the requirements of Resolution No. 1684 for operating documents and marking and must be in Russian. On the Union path, they must additionally comply with EEC Decision No. 27 on general safety and effectiveness requirements and the requirements for marking and operating documents, and must bear the special medical device circulation mark of the Union market established by EEC Decision No. 26. The two sets of requirements are cumulative: a product registered on the Union path and circulating in Russia must satisfy both the Russian-language requirements and the Union requirements at the same time.

For packaging and documentation teams this means the artwork process has a regulatory dimension from the very first draft. Colour photographs of labels and packaging, interface images for software and the circulation mark artwork all form part of the registration file, and any later change to a field on the label is a potential change project under the registration rules rather than a simple print correction. Companies that place labelling under change control early avoid the common situation where a marketing-driven packaging update silently invalidates the registered documents.

The practical starting point is an inventory of every marking element and every instruction field, mapped to the requirement that governs it on each path. For a Union-path product this inventory has two columns, one for the national requirements and one for the Union requirements, and any element covered by both is checked against the stricter wording. The inventory then becomes the master document for artwork reviews: designers, translators and regulatory staff all work from the same list, and nothing reaches the printing house without being reconciled against it.

2. Legal basis

The instruments governing labelling, instructions for use and the circulation mark are summarised below.

RegulationNumberDateProvisions
Decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission on General Safety and Effectiveness Requirements and Requirements for Marking and Operating DocumentsEEC Decision No. 27February 12, 2016Content requirements for marking and operating documents
Decision of the Eurasian Economic Commission on the Special Medical Device Circulation Mark of the Union MarketEEC Decision No. 26February 12, 2016Mark design and usage requirements
Government Resolution of the Russian Federation on the State Registration Rules for Medical DevicesGovernment Resolution of the Russian Federation No. 1684November 30, 2024p. 5 (operating documents, colour photographs and interface images)
Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia on the Safety Monitoring Procedure for Medical DevicesOrder of the Ministry of Health of Russia No. 540nMay 26, 2026 (effective September 1, 2026)Handling of deficiencies in instructions and labelling

3. Expert insights

Insight 1: the label is part of the registration dossier, not a printing step. Resolution No. 1684 requires the submission of colour photographs containing the label and packaging, with dimensions of at least 18 × 24 centimetres, and for software also colour images of the electronic media and the software interface. A physical product that does not match the approved artwork equals a non-conforming dossier. This connection between print reality and regulatory file is often underestimated by marketing teams, who treat packaging revisions as commercial decisions. In Russia the registered artwork is the reference, and the printed product must follow it.

Insight 2: deficiencies in instructions and labelling enter the adverse event assessment. Order No. 540n brings situations such as users being unable to understand how to use the device safely, incomplete or contradictory instructions, missing important warnings, and labels on which the model or batch cannot be identified into the evaluation of adverse events. The consequence of poor translation quality is thus quantified at the regulatory level: an unclear Russian IFU is not merely a customer-experience defect but a monitoring finding. Professional native-speaker review of warnings, contraindications and handling steps is a compliance measure, not a cosmetic one.

Insight 3: the mark requirements differ between the two paths. The national path has no separate mark requirement, while the Union path requires the special circulation mark under Decision No. 26, which is distinct from the EAC conformity mark. Misusing the mark, or applying the EAC mark where the medical device circulation mark is required, creates additional explanation costs at customs clearance and in public procurement. The mark artwork and its usage rules should therefore be fixed at the packaging design stage together with the Russian-language label content.

Translation is the place where most labelling defects are born. A term that is correct in general Russian may be wrong in the device context, and an instruction that reads fluently may still be unexecutable at the point of care. The review that matters is therefore performed by someone who both speaks Russian natively and understands the clinical use of the product, and it verifies not grammar but actionability: whether the stated steps, warnings and contraindications can actually be followed by the intended user. Building this review into the artwork timeline, with room for a second iteration, is cheaper than correcting labels after a monitoring finding.

4. Practical recommendations

  1. Bring label artwork management under change control: evaluate any change of a field first for whether it requires a change filing under the registration rules.
  2. For Union-path products, prepare the circulation mark artwork in vector form together with usage instructions, and finalise it during packaging design.
  3. Subject the Russian instructions for use to native-speaker review before finalisation, focusing on the executability of contraindications, warnings and handling steps.
  4. Produce and archive the colour photographs of labels and packaging in the required format, and for software the interface images, as part of the dossier set.
  5. Check the translated terminology against the registered device name and intended use, so that the label, the IFU and the dossier speak one language.

5. Verification checklist

  • □ The Russian label artwork matches the colour photographs submitted in the dossier
  • □ Software products have provided images of the electronic media and the interface
  • □ Union-path products correctly use the circulation mark under Decision No. 26
  • □ The instructions for use have passed native Russian-language review
  • □ Any change to labels or instructions goes through the change review process

Regulatory information verified as of October 29, 2026.

GRZAN supports manufacturers in preparing labelling and instructions for use for the Russian market, from Russian-language artwork and native-speaker review of IFU content to the correct application of the EAEU circulation mark and the alignment of packaging with the registered dossier. Our team helps you keep print reality and regulatory documentation in exact correspondence. For support with labelling and IFU compliance in Russia, contact us at info@grzanglobal.com.

Disclaimer

Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.

About GRZAN

GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.

GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.

Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.

What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.

Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.

Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.

Take your devices global with GRZAN

We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.

Contact us
WhatsApp
QR Code
WhatsApp QR Code
Scan to chat on WhatsApp
Phone
Call
Office Mon-Fri 9:00-18:00
0755-88659477
Mobile 24/7 Service
+86 15816864648
Email
Mail