Cancellation Grounds under Article 88

Updated: 2026-11-12 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20

1. Key takeaways

Cancellation of a registration certificate and prohibition of sale are two distinct tracks. Article 38 of Acuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023 first prohibits the sale of products in eight states: expired (caducados), altered (alterados), adulterated (adulterados), contaminated (contaminados), fraudulent (fraudulentos), spurious (espurios), defective (defectuosos) and deteriorated (deteriorados). Article 88 then sets out five grounds for cancelling an authorisation already issued: proof that the device is harmful, ineffective or unsafe under conditions of normal use and constitutes a foreseeable risk; proof that its qualitative or quantitative composition does not match the authorisation, or that it violates the quality and safety guarantees declared in the dossier (to be substantiated by an analysis report issued by a laboratory designated by ARSA); an application by the registration holder itself; duplication of an authorisation already issued by ARSA; and any other situation ARSA concludes upon after a technical-legal analysis.

2. Legal basis

The table below consolidates the sale prohibitions of Article 38, the five cancellation grounds of Article 88, and the quality-control provisions that supply the evidentiary chain leading to cancellation.

LevelInstrumentProvisionKey point
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Article 38, first paragraphEight prohibited states: expired, altered, adulterated, contaminated, fraudulent, spurious, defective, deteriorated
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Article 38, second paragraphFour situations withholding marketing authorisation: national or international alerts; scientific evidence of non-conformity with quality, safety or effectiveness; false dossier data; substandard or counterfeit findings upon analysis
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Article 88, item 1Harmful, ineffective or unsafe under conditions of normal use and constituting a foreseeable risk
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Article 88, item 2Composition inconsistent with the authorisation or violating the quality and safety guarantees declared in the dossier, substantiated by an analysis report from a laboratory designated by ARSA
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Article 88, items 3, 4 and 5Application by the holder for cancellation; duplication of the authorisation; other situations following ARSA’s technical-legal analysis
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Article 80ARSA conducts quality control at any stage of the regulatory cycle, entrusting accredited external laboratories where it lacks capability
RegulationAcuerdo No. 0631-ARSA-2023Articles 36 and 37Seizure and disposal, and penalties for expired or unauthorised products

3. Expert insights

Insight 1: the eight prohibited states describe the condition of the product, not the conduct of the company. The eight adjectives listed in the first paragraph of Article 38 all point to the state in which the product itself is found, regardless of whether a registration was ever obtained. This also explains why Article 36 (seizure and disposal) and Article 37 (penalties for expired or unauthorised products) follow immediately: an unsatisfactory condition alone can trigger inspection action, without any prior cancellation of the registration.

Insight 2: cancellation item 2 makes a laboratory report the means of proof. Article 88, item 2 requires the finding to be comprobada mediante un reporte de análisis emitido por un laboratorio de calidad establecido por la ARSA — substantiated by an analysis report issued by a quality laboratory established by ARSA. Read together with Article 80 (ARSA laboratories or accredited external laboratories at home and abroad) and Article 82 (testing costs borne by the licence holder), the chain is: sampling, laboratory analysis, report, cancellation — with the cost borne by the licence holder.

Insight 3: item 3 is the only proactive exit. Among the five cancellation grounds, only application by the registration holder is an action a company can initiate itself. When a product leaves the market, is discontinued, or a corporate group is consolidated, applying proactively for cancellation is cleaner than letting the registration lapse — the latter falls into passive handling under Article 37 and the other grounds of Article 88.

Insight 4: item 4 extends duplicate authorisation from refusal to revocation. Article 87, item 4 prevents duplicate authorisation from arising; Article 88, item 4 provides that duplicate authorisation discovered afterwards is to be cancelled. The two provisions together form a complete life-cycle control over duplication.

Insight 5: refusal and cancellation share the substandard-or-counterfeit judgement. Article 87, item 7 (refusal of authorisation) and Article 38, second paragraph, item 4 (withholding of marketing authorisation) both rest on the conclusion of scientific analysis, while Article 88, item 2 approaches through composition inconsistent with the declaration. Their mechanisms of proof differ, but all three land on laboratory analysis and dossier consistency.

4. Practical recommendations

  • Write the eight prohibited states into warehouse and channel inspection standards: expired, altered, adulterated, contaminated, fraudulent, spurious, defective and deteriorated — any hit means withdrawal from sale (Article 38).
  • Maintain a dossier-consistency ledger: the qualitative and quantitative composition of the authorisation and the quality and safety guarantees declared must remain comparable with every batch actually produced, avoiding the trap of Article 88, item 2.
  • When exiting the market, apply proactively for cancellation (Article 88, item 3) instead of waiting for the registration to expire and be handled under Article 37.
  • Companies registered through multiple channels should audit once a year for duplicate authorisations (Article 88, item 4) and, where found, proactively apply to cancel one of them.
  • Upon receiving a sampling notice, budget for testing and sample transport under Article 82, and cooperate with the two sample batches of Article 81 (analysis sample and retention sample).
  • Where an objection to the laboratory analysis report exists, submit review materials before the cancellation procedure advances, and keep complete communication records.

5. Verification checklist

  • □ Warehouse and channel inspection standards cover the eight prohibited states of Article 38
  • □ A ledger comparing authorised composition with actual batches has been established
  • □ The path for proactive cancellation of withdrawn products has been defined
  • □ An annual audit mechanism for duplicate authorisations has been established
  • □ The sampling cooperation procedure (two sample batches, cost bearing) has been written into SOPs
  • □ A responsible person has been designated for review and appeal against laboratory analysis reports

Related reading: [Article 45 — Tecnovigilancia rules and the 72-hour clock](/honduras-medical-device-registration/tecnovigilancia-acuerdo-0185-2025/) | [Article 43 — Eight refusal grounds](/honduras-medical-device-registration/refusal-grounds-article-87/) | [Article 47 — Quality control sampling and cost bearing](/honduras-medical-device-registration/quality-control-sampling-and-costs/)

Regulatory information verified as of October 29, 2026.

How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the Honduran market. Our team manages Secretariat of Health (SESAL) registration applications, prepares Spanish-language dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com

Disclaimer

Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.

About GRZAN

GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.

GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.

Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.

What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.

Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.

Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.

Take your devices global with GRZAN

We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.

Contact us
WhatsApp
QR Code
WhatsApp QR Code
Scan to chat on WhatsApp
Phone
Call
Office Mon-Fri 9:00-18:00
0755-88659477
Mobile 24/7 Service
+86 15816864648
Email
Mail