El Salvador Medical Device Legal Framework: Four Layers of Law
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
The legal sources for devices in El Salvador divide into four layers. Layer one is the medicines law, the Ley de Medicamentos (Decreto Legislativo No. 1008, 2012-03-02), together with its general regulation (Decreto Ejecutivo No. 245, 2012-12-20). Layer two is the institutional law, Decreto Legislativo No. 891 of 2023-12-04. Layer three consists of three Salvadoran technical regulations: RTS 11.03.02:21 as the main rule, RTS 11.03.03:22 on manufacturing practice and RTS 11.03.04:23 on technovigilance. Layer four is the SRS tariff schedule and its reliance policy. RTS 11.03.02:21 is the governing text for registration, while the other three layers answer three separate questions: where the power comes from, who exercises it, and how much is paid and whether evidence can be reused.
Reading the framework as a single statute is the most common analytical error. Each layer has its own issuing procedure, its own amendment cycle and its own publication record, so a citation that is correct today can be overtaken by a tariff revision or a policy version without any change to the technical regulation itself.
- The base is a medicines law, not a stand-alone medical device law.
- The institutional layer changed the executing body while the technical text still names the DNM.
- Three technical regulations apply cumulatively, not as alternatives: conduct, quality system and post-market vigilance.
- The 2025 tariff and the reliance policy are administration-level instruments and move faster than the RTS.
- Fees are quoted in US dollars, the lawful currency of El Salvador, and are exempt from IVA.
2. Legal basis
The four layers are published in different instruments and at different times. The table below records each one with its reference, publication data and the provision through which it enters a device file.
| Layer | Instrument | Reference | Publication | Provision | Point |
| Law (base) | Ley de Medicamentos | Decreto Legislativo No. 1008 | 2012-03-02 (Diario Oficial No. 43, Tomo No. 394) | Full text (cited by Article 7.2 of the RTS) | Legal foundation for device regulation |
| Regulation (base) | Reglamento General de la Ley de Medicamentos | Decreto Ejecutivo No. 245 | 2012-12-20 (Diario Oficial No. 239, Tomo No. 397) | Full text (cited by Article 7.3) | General implementing regulation of the medicines law |
| Law (institutional) | Ley de la Superintendencia de Regulación Sanitaria | Decreto Legislativo No. 891 | 2023-12-04 (Diario Oficial No. 227, Tomo No. 441) | Full text | Creates the SRS |
| Technical regulation (main) | RTS 11.03.02:21 | Acuerdo No. 14-2022 | 2022-08-23 (Diario Oficial No. 156, Tomo No. 436) | Full text, 10 chapters | Sanitary regulation requirements for devices; the governing text |
| Technical regulation | RTS 11.03.03:22 | Acuerdo No. 13-2022 | 2022-08-23 (same issue of the journal) | Full text (cited by Articles 5.3.2 and 6.5.1 a)) | Good manufacturing practices and verification guide |
| Technical regulation | RTS 11.03.04:23 | Acuerdo No. DN.05.2024 | 2024-04-12 (Diario Oficial No. 68, Tomo No. 443) | Full text (linked by Article 6.5.3) | Post-market surveillance and technovigilance |
| Tariff | Tarifario de la SRS (2025 edition) | Resolution of the Consejo de la SRS | 2025-10 (SRS website) | Sections 3, 6.2, 7, 11, 12.2; Articles 1, 2, 4, 7 | Prices for 23 service categories, in US dollars, IVA exempt |
| Policy | Política de Aplicación de Reliance | 01.01.02.POL.20250508.01 | 2025-05-08 (SRS website) | Sections 6.1 to 6.8 | Reliance principles and the list of reusable evidence for devices |
3. Expert insights
Insight one: the base is a medicines law, not a dedicated device law. El Salvador has no separate medical device statute, and device regulation hangs beneath the medicines law. That explains why so many terms in RTS 11.03.02:21, such as registration holder, responsible professional and establishment authorisation, are borrowed from the medicines system. For an applicant the practical effect is that the general procedural requirements of the medicines law apply as a fallback: where the RTS is silent, there is not an absence of rules but a return to the medicines law and its general regulation. A dossier that satisfies the RTS yet ignores the parent law is therefore only half compliant.
Insight two: the official text contains a numbering slip that matters when citing. Article 7.3 of RTS 11.03.02:21 cites the general regulation of the medicines law as “Decreto Legislativo No 245”, whereas the formal reference of that instrument is Decreto Ejecutivo No. 245, an executive decree rather than a legislative one. The error is a defect in the official text and does not affect validity, but citations in a file should follow the formal reference so that a reviewer has no reason to query the source. The same discipline applies to every cross-reference copied forward into a cover letter.
Insight three: the three technical regulations divide the field into conduct, system and aftermath. RTS 11.03.02:21 governs registration and circulation, RTS 11.03.03:22 governs the manufacturing quality system, and RTS 11.03.04:23 governs post-market vigilance. These are not three parallel options but three sets of obligations that one company carries at the same time: an importer needs an establishment authorisation under Article 6.2 of RTS 11.03.02:21, the establishment needs a quality system under RTS 11.03.03:22, and it also needs a vigilance contact under RTS 11.03.04:23. Missing any one of the three leaves the other two unable to carry the product to market.
Insight four: the tariff and the reliance policy are the new variables of 2025. The 2025 edition of the tariff was issued by the Consejo de la SRS, and its Article 5 states that matters not provided for in the schedule remain subject to the special price law for DNM services. The practical reading is that the basis can run on two tracks, and the operative figure is the current payment instruction (mandamiento de pago) issued by the SRS rather than any historical table. Budgets built from a previous schedule, or from a third-party quotation, should be treated as a practical estimate only.
4. Practical recommendations
- Write the four layers into the internal manual and mark the first page of every file with the basis relied on: RTS 11.03.02:21 (Acuerdo No. 14-2022), the medicines law (DL No. 1008) and the general regulation (DE No. 245).
- Cite the general regulation consistently as Decreto Ejecutivo No. 245, keeping the slip in Article 7.3 of the RTS clearly distinguished in internal notes.
- Keep a separate obligation register for each of the three technical regulations, covering circulation, quality system and vigilance, rather than merging them into a single table.
- Treat official fees as the current SRS payment instruction, using historical tables and third-party quotations for estimation only.
- Where reliance is claimed, cite the policy version 01.01.02.POL.20250508.01 in the application so the reviewer can locate the basis.
- Review the NORMATIVAS and LISTADOS sections of the SRS website every quarter, since both the technical regulations and the tariff can be updated on a rolling basis.
5. Verification checklist
- □ The first page of the file lists the four layers and their references
- □ The general regulation is cited as Decreto Ejecutivo No. 245
- □ Separate obligation registers exist for the three technical regulations
- □ The fee basis has been confirmed against the current SRS payment instruction
- □ The reliance application states the policy version number
- □ A quarterly review reminder for the SRS website is in place
Instruments cited: Ley de Medicamentos (Decreto Legislativo No. 1008, Diario Oficial No. 43, Tomo No. 394, 2012-03-02); Reglamento General de la Ley de Medicamentos (Decreto Ejecutivo No. 245, Diario Oficial No. 239, Tomo No. 397, 2012-12-20); Ley de la Superintendencia de Regulación Sanitaria (Decreto Legislativo No. 891, Diario Oficial No. 227, Tomo No. 441, 2023-12-04); RTS 11.03.02:21 (Acuerdo No. 14-2022, Diario Oficial No. 156, Tomo No. 436, 2022-08-23), Articles 7.2 and 7.3; RTS 11.03.03:22 (Acuerdo No. 13-2022, same journal); RTS 11.03.04:23 (Acuerdo No. DN.05.2024, Diario Oficial No. 68, Tomo No. 443, 2024-04-12); Tarifario de la SRS, 2025 edition; Política de Aplicación de Reliance (01.01.02.POL.20250508.01, Version No. 01, SRS website, 2025-05-08).
Regulatory information verified as at 29 October 2026.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the Salvadoran market. Our team manages Ministry of Health (MINSAL) sanitary registration applications, prepares Spanish-language dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us