Class I Subclasses in New Zealand: Basic, Measuring and Sterile Devices
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
Regulatory information verified as of 29 October 2026
1. Key takeaways
New Zealand has five risk classes: under regulation 11 of SR 2003/325, Class I is the lowest, Class IIa and Class IIb are progressively higher, and Class III and AIMD are the highest classes. Within Class I, the WAND (Web Assisted Notification of Devices) notification system further distinguishes the basic, measuring and sterile subclasses. The 22 Schedule 2 rules determine the class; the three subclasses are a second-layer selection made after the class has been determined.
After verifying the official text, the GRZAN regulatory team points to a fact that is often overlooked: the body of SR 2003/325 (including reg 11 and Schedule 2) does not contain any stand-alone definition provisions for basic, measuring or sterile; Schedule 2 simply lands devices in Class I through two fallbacks, rule 2 (non-invasive devices are Class I by default) and rule 10 (active devices are Class I by default). The three subclasses come from the GHTF classification framework adopted in the Medsafe risk classification guidance and the WAND entry system, and are an operational-level convention (practical estimate).
Return to the origin of the system: New Zealand has no pre-market approval for medical devices, issues no registration certificates, and Medsafe performs no technical review; WAND is a mandatory post-arrival notification database, not a pre-market access gate. The entire function of classes and subclasses is to fill in the WAND record correctly.
For the Sponsor (New Zealand sponsor), a wrong subclass means not a fine but a record that no longer matches the product, creating exposure under the reg 7(c) accurate-and-complete declaration and possibly triggering the 10 working day correction duty under reg 8.
The subclasses merit their own article because Class I has the largest notification volume in New Zealand. Most basic dressings, ordinary surgical instruments, wheelchairs, eyeglass frames and conventional non-sterile consumables fall here; the class itself is rarely disputed, and the disputes concentrate on the choice of subclass (practical estimate).
2. Legal basis
The table below lists the regulatory and official sources verified for this article and the provisions relied on.
| Regulation or official source | Reference | Date | Provisions |
| Medicines (Database of Medical Devices) Regulations 2003 | SR 2003/325 | Made on 17 November 2003; Gazette notice 20 November 2003; came into force on 1 January 2004 (reg 2); current version as at 7 August 2020 | reg 11 (five-class ordering), reg 12, reg 13(2)(7), Schedule 2 rules 1, 2 and 10, reg 5(1)(a), reg 5(3), reg 8 |
| Medicines Act 1981 | 1981 No 118 | Royal assent 23 October 1981; commenced on 1 August 1984; latest version as at 10 July 2026 | s 105 (authorising provision for the regulations) |
| Medsafe, Risk Classification | —— | Revised 10 May 2011 | Guidance on Class I subclasses and the classification framework |
| Medsafe, What is WAND | —— | Revised 1 July 2014 | WAND fields and entry conventions |
3. Expert insights
Insight 1: determine the class first, then select the subclass.
Rules 2 and 10 of Schedule 2 share the same structure — Class I by default unless another rule of this Schedule assigns a higher class. This means Class I is the product of exclusion, not of active selection. Only after confirming that the device is not hit by any higher-class rule does subclass selection begin. Reversing the order, selecting a subclass first and then fitting the rules, is the most common determination error in practice (practical estimate).
Insight 2: the determination criteria for the three subclasses.
- Basic: the device has no measuring function and is not supplied sterile. This is the default state of Class I; anything that does not fall into the other two subclasses is basic.
- Measuring: the device has a measuring function whose measurement accuracy has a substantive bearing on clinical judgement or patient management. The key to the determination is whether measurement is one of the core intended purposes of the device, not whether a scale happens to be printed on it.
- Sterile: the device is supplied sterile, or its intended use requires it to be sterile at the time of use. The key to the determination is the manufacturer’s supply state and intended purpose, not whether the end user sterilises it themselves.
These determination criteria derive from the prevailing operational conventions under the Medsafe classification framework; SR 2003/325 does not define each of them (practical estimate). Companies should take the manufacturer’s written confirmation of the supply state and intended purpose as the basis of determination.
Insight 3: how to handle a device that meets several subclasses at once.
Schedule 2 and reg 13 contain no dedicated provision for subclass conflicts. Reg 13(7) provides that where several rules apply, the highest class is taken; GRZAN considers that this take-the-highest logic can be applied by analogy to subclass conflicts, so that a measuring device supplied sterile is filed under the stricter subclass (practical estimate). This treatment involves no change of class and affects only the precision of the WAND record.
Insight 4: three knock-on effects of subclass selection.
First, the subclass does not change the class and therefore does not trigger the UPI requirement of reg 5(2) — the UPI applies only to Class III and AIMD. Second, Class I falls within the scope of grouped entry under reg 5(3), provided the manufacturer, the GMDN code and the risk classification are the same. Third, an inaccurate subclass triggers the 10 working day correction duty under reg 8 and touches the penalty in reg 14 (fine not exceeding NZ$500 on conviction).
Insight 5: common misclassification patterns.
First, filing conventionally supplied low-risk devices that are supplied sterile as basic, overlooking the supply state. Second, filing devices that carry a scale but serve no clinical measuring purpose as measuring. Third, transplanting the Is and Im determination habits of the EU MDR to New Zealand without verifying the local conventions (practical estimate). Fourth, a Sponsor failing to update the record after the manufacturer changes the sterilisation method or the packaging state.
4. Practical recommendations
- GRZAN recommends setting the class and the Class I subclass as two independent fields in the classification determination table: first complete the class scan across the 22 Schedule 2 rules, then confirm the subclass by supply state and measuring function, avoiding a reversed order.
- GRZAN requires written manufacturer confirmation on two facts: whether the device is supplied sterile, and whether it has a measuring function serving a clinical purpose. Until they are answered, the subclass can only be guessed, and the cost of guessing falls on the Sponsor under the reg 7 declaration.
- Store the subclass determination basis (the manufacturer’s written confirmation plus the relevant GMDN term definition wording) in the technical documentation, for later corrections and disputes (practical estimate).
- Where a product line contains both sterile and non-sterile versions, split them into different records by supply state; do not file them together (practical estimate).
- Set up change monitoring: any change in sterilisation method, packaging state or measuring function enters the 10 working day correction trigger list under reg 8.
- When re-checking the correspondence with European classification, return first to the local rules of Schedule 2 of SR 2003/325; do not carry over foreign conclusions directly.
5. Verification checklist
- □ The class determination has been completed, confirming that the device is not hit by any higher-class rule of Schedule 2.
- □ It has been confirmed that the device is Class I within the 5 classes of reg 11.
- □ Written confirmation from the manufacturer has been obtained on whether the device is supplied sterile.
- □ Written confirmation from the manufacturer has been obtained on whether the device has a measuring function serving a clinical purpose.
- □ Where subclasses conflicted, the stricter subclass has been taken (practical estimate).
- □ Sterile and non-sterile versions within the same product line have been split into separate records.
- □ It has been confirmed that Class I does not involve the UPI requirement of reg 5(2).
- □ The feasibility of grouped entry for Class I records has been assessed under reg 5(3).
- □ Subclass-related changes have been brought into the 10 working day correction trigger mechanism.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the New Zealand market. Our team prepares WAND-compliant evidence dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us