Priority Review and Conditional Approval Pathways for Medical Devices
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
The Macao regime provides 2 accelerated and flexible channels for special situations: Dispatch No. 8/ISAF/2026 on the specific requirements for applying for priority review of medical device registration, and Dispatch No. 9/ISAF/2026 on the specific requirements for applying for conditional approval of medical device registration. The former addresses speed, while the latter addresses situations where the evidence is not yet complete but the clinical need is pressing. Both channels require an active application, and each has a price: priority review requires meeting the eligibility conditions set out in the dispatch, while conditional approval means approval with conditions, and failure to fulfil the conditions constitutes a risk.
- Priority review solves a timing problem; conditional approval solves an evidence problem, and the two must not be conflated.
- Conditional approval interacts with the registration holder obligations of Article 16 of Law No. 12/2025.
- Both dispatches overlap with, but are distinct from, the innovative medical device pathway under Dispatch No. 15/ISAF/2026.
- Acceleration does not change the suspension rules: a deficiency correction still suspends the period.
- The eligibility judgements for both channels leave room for regulatory discretion, so the pre-procedure consultation should be used to confirm the applicable interpretation before submitting.
2. Legal basis
The priority review and conditional approval channels are governed by the following instruments, verified as of 29 October 2026.
| Regulation | Reference | Publication | Provisions |
| Specific requirements for applying for priority review of medical device registration | Dispatch No. 8/ISAF/2026 | Published in 2026; in force on 1 July 2026 | Full text of the dispatch |
| Specific requirements for applying for conditional approval of medical device registration | Dispatch No. 9/ISAF/2026 | Published in 2026; in force on 1 July 2026 | Full text of the dispatch |
| Implementing Rules of the Medical Device Supervision System | Administrative Regulation No. 11/2026 (Issue No. 20/2026 of the Official Gazette) | Published on 18 May 2026; in force on 1 July 2026 | Article 12 (pre-procedure consultation for registration); Article 15 (decision on registration); Article 17 (approval period for registration) |
| Medical Device Supervision System | Law No. 12/2025 (Issue No. 30/2025 of the Official Gazette) | Published on 28 July 2025; in force on 1 July 2026 | Article 10 (special committee); Article 16 (obligations of registration holders and persons making notifications) |
3. Expert insights
Insight 1: the two channels solve different problems and must not be used interchangeably. Priority review targets time — the product already has a complete dossier on the basis of existing evidence, and the applicant merely wishes to shorten the queue; conditional approval targets evidence — the dossier is incomplete but the clinical value is significant, and approval is allowed in advance subject to the fulfilment of conditions. Treating conditional approval as a shortcut when the dossier is incomplete is a misuse of the channel and, once the conditions attached to it are not fulfilled, becomes a compliance risk in its own right.
Insight 2: conditional approval stacks on top of the Article 16 obligations. Article 16 of Law No. 12/2025 sets out the obligations of the registration holder (ensuring compliance with quality standards, maintaining the quality management system, formulating post-market study and risk control plans, adverse event monitoring and post-market evaluation, product traceability and recall, and allocating resources). After conditional approval, these obligations become the vehicle for fulfilling the conditions — post-market studies and risk control plans above all, since the evidence gap that justified the conditional approval is precisely what those studies and plans are expected to close within the agreed timetable.
Insight 3: the two dispatches overlap with, but are not identical to, the innovative medical device channel. The technical instruction for the innovative device channel is Dispatch No. 15/ISAF/2026 (the list of third-party technical review bodies); priority review and conditional approval are two separate channels. A product may qualify for both the innovative device channel and priority review, and the applications should be filed separately.
Insight 4: acceleration does not change the suspension rules. The suspension clause of Article 17(3) applies equally to priority review — a deficiency correction still suspends the period. What priority review shortens is the queuing and review time; it does not waive document quality, and any request for further information or notice of correction will still suspend the running of the approval period until the applicant has responded.
4. Practical recommendations
- Run an eligibility self-assessment first: confirm eligibility item by item against Dispatches No. 8 and No. 9/ISAF/2026; applying without eligibility wastes the window.
- Run priority review in parallel with a complete dossier: acceleration presupposes a complete dossier; filing for acceleration while still fixing the dossier puts the cart before the horse.
- Design the condition-fulfilment plan before applying for conditional approval: write the timetable for post-market studies, risk controls and supplementary evidence into the plan, and execute it immediately upon approval.
- Assess the three channels separately: judge the innovative device channel, priority review and conditional approval according to product characteristics, and file together those parts that can be combined.
- Confirm the applicable interpretation through the pre-procedure consultation: the eligibility judgement for accelerated channels leaves room for discretion; consult first, then submit.
5. Verification checklist
- □ Eligibility for priority review has been confirmed against Dispatch No. 8/ISAF/2026
- □ Eligibility for conditional approval has been confirmed against Dispatch No. 9/ISAF/2026
- □ The timing problem and the evidence problem have been distinguished, and the corresponding channel selected
- □ The condition-fulfilment plan for conditional approval has been prepared in advance
- □ Combined application with the innovative device channel (Dispatch No. 15/ISAF/2026) has been assessed
- □ The eligibility judgement has been confirmed through the pre-procedure consultation
Regulatory information verified as of 29 October 2026. The regulations, guidelines and effective dates described in this article are limited to the content published by the official sources listed under Legal basis as of that date; where official documents are subsequently updated, the latest published version prevails.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for Macao, China. Our team manages Health Bureau (SSM) pre-market registration and notification applications, prepares reference-approval dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us