FDA and CE Certificate Scope: Mandatory Only by Country of Origin
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
Nicaragua applies an origin-based rule to the FDA and CE certificates: the FDA certificate is mandatory only for products manufactured in the United States (Chapter 6, item 7, closing sentence: La obligatoriedad del Certificado FDA es aplicable solo a productos fabricados en Estados Unidos), and the CE certificate is mandatory only for European Union manufacturers (item 9: Aplicado obligatoriamente a fabricantes de la Unión Europea). Both require an original or a notarially certified copy, Spanish or a notarially certified translation, and an apostille or consular legalisation.
- The test is where the product is made, not whether a certificate happens to exist in the company’s files.
- The two conditions sit in different items of Chapter 6: the FDA rule at the end of item 7, the CE rule in item 9.
- The CE rule looks at the manufacturer’s location, while the FDA rule looks at the country of manufacture; they are not drafted identically.
- Both certificates follow the same three-layer legalisation chain as the CLV.
- Neither certificate determines the Nicaraguan risk classification, which ANRS sets itself under Annex B.
2. Legal basis
The table sets out the two origin rules together with the related provisions on legalisation of the ISO 13485 certificate, on classification and on renewal, so that the scope of each certificate can be read against its actual wording.
| Level | Instrument | Provision | Key point |
| Technical standard | NTON 24001:2023, Tecnología de la salud. Dispositivos médicos. Requisitos para el Registro Sanitario (La Gaceta No. 192, 21 October 2024) | Chapter 6, item 7, closing sentence | The FDA certificate is mandatory only for products manufactured in the United States |
| Technical standard | NTON 24001:2023 | Chapter 6, item 9 | CE certificate: original or notarially certified copy, Spanish or notarially certified translation, apostille or consular legalisation; mandatory for European Union manufacturers |
| Technical standard | NTON 24001:2023 | Chapter 6, item 8, NOTA | Where the ISO 13485 certificate carries no verification mechanism, an apostille or consular legalisation is required |
| Technical standard | NTON 24001:2023 | Chapter 5, Article 3 | ANRS classifies devices itself under Annex B, independently of classifications registered in other countries |
| Technical standard | NTON 24001:2023 | Chapter 8, Article 1(e) | The renewal dossier likewise includes the CE certificate requirement |
| Technical standard | NTON 24001:2023 | Chapter 6, item 7 | The CLV or its equivalent applies generally, issued by the competent authority of the country of manufacture or a PAHO/WHO regional reference authority |
3. Expert insights
Insight 1: the test is origin, not whether a certificate exists. A product manufactured in the United States must submit an FDA certificate even if it already holds a CE certificate, and an EU manufacturer must submit a CE certificate even if it already holds an FDA certificate. For products from neither the United States nor the European Union, the text does not require either category.
Insight 2: the two mandatory rules are written in different items. The FDA rule appears in the closing sentence of item 7, the CLV item, while the CE rule appears in item 9. Readers easily find only one of them, which is an example of provisions dispersed within a single chapter and a common reason for companies concluding, wrongly, that both certificates are required or that neither is.
Insight 3: the two rules are not drafted in identical terms. The CE rule refers to fabricantes de la Unión Europea, the location of the manufacturer, while the FDA rule refers to productos fabricados en Estados Unidos, the country where the product is made. Multinational groups must therefore assess each legal entity and each actual manufacturing site separately, rather than applying the group’s headquarters location across the board.
Insight 4: the legalisation requirements match those for the CLV: an original or notarially certified copy, Spanish or a notarially certified translation, and an apostille or consular legalisation. The chains for the CLV, the CE certificate and the ISO 13485 certificate share the same structure, so they can be processed together in one pass.
Insight 5: these certificates are admission evidence, not a basis for classification. Article 3 of Chapter 5 states clearly that ANRS classifies devices itself under Annex B, independently of classifications registered elsewhere. Submitting an FDA or CE certificate does not alter Nicaragua’s own risk classification, a point that is frequently confused when the dossier checklist is planned.
Insight 6: the certificates are also required at renewal. Article 1(e) of Chapter 8 lists the CE certificate among the renewal documents. Certificate expiry and registration expiry are two independent dates and must be monitored separately; otherwise a renewal can arise with a certificate that has lapsed while the registration is still in force.
4. Practical recommendations
- Assess the requirement against the actual country of manufacture and the manufacturer’s location: US manufacture calls for the FDA certificate, an EU manufacturer calls for the CE certificate, and neither origin calls for neither.
- Put a comparison table of the two rules into the internal SOP, so that the reading “both are required” or “neither is required” does not take hold.
- For multinational groups, decide by legal entity and manufacturing site, not by the location of group headquarters.
- Process the legalisation chains for the CLV, CE and ISO 13485 certificates together, to avoid repeated notarisation.
- Manage the FDA and CE certificates as admission evidence, kept separate from the classification conclusion, so that they are not misread as a basis for classification.
- Maintain two expiry tables, one for certificates and one for registrations, and replace certificates before renewal is filed.
5. Verification checklist
- □ The mandatory status of the FDA and CE certificates has been assessed against the actual origin and the manufacturer’s location
- □ The internal SOP contains a comparison table of the two rules
- □ Multinational groups have been assessed by legal entity and manufacturing site, not by headquarters location
- □ The legalisation chains for the CLV, CE and ISO 13485 certificates have been processed in one pass
- □ The FDA and CE certificates are managed as admission evidence, kept separate from the classification conclusion
- □ Two expiry tables exist, for certificates and for registrations, and certificates are replaced before renewal
Related reading: [ISO 13485 and MDSAP: the waiver of six monograph items](/nicaragua-medical-device-registration/iso-13485-and-mdsap-exemption/) | [Electrical safety certificate: IEC, UL, CSA or equivalent](/nicaragua-medical-device-registration/electrical-safety-certificate/) | [ANRS classifies devices itself, independently of other countries](/nicaragua-medical-device-registration/anrs-sets-risk-class-itself/)
Regulatory information verified as of 29 October 2026.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the Nicaraguan market. Our team manages Ministry of Health (MINSA) sanitary registration applications, prepares Spanish-language dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us