Costa Rica Regulatory Timeline 2022-2026
Updated: 2026-11-12 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
Costa Rica’s current device regulation is RTCR 505:2022, approved by Decreto Ejecutivo N° 43902-S on 30 November 2022; Article 7 of the approving decree provides for entry into force 6 months after publication, and Article 4 repeals Articles 1 to 18, 20, 22 and 24 to 30 of DE 34482-S (2008-03-03, La Gaceta N° 80 Alcance 19, 2008-04-25) together with the equivalence procedure DAJ-RM-1151-08. The 2024 amending decree (internal number MS-AJ-CB-200-2024) rewrote Articles 4.7, 10.20, 17.3 and 18.11.4, and extended the label completion window of Transitorio III from 6 months to 18 months. The GRZAN regulatory team notes: the only item in this timeline still counting down is the national BPM regulation — Transitorio IV requires the Ministry of Health to issue it within 12 months of entry into force.
- The main regulation uses a 6-months-after-publication buffer, not force-upon-publication.
- Four transitional provisions handle BPM certificates, existing registered uses, label completion and the BPM rulemaking deadline.
- The 2024 amendment solved CLV sourcing and equivalence-chain breaks, and tripled the label window.
- Repeal and reference replacement operated together: old references to DE 34482-S are read as references to the new decree.
- The formal text states no Gazette number or date, so no calendar effective date is given here.
2. Legal basis
The timeline rests on the approving decree and its transitional provisions, the 2024 amendment, and the earlier decrees that the current regulation references or replaces.
| Current main regulation | RTCR 505:2022 (DE 43902-S) | Approved 2022-11-30; Article 7 | In force 6 months after publication (Official Gazette; the text states no Gazette number or date) |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Article 4 | Repeals Articles 1 to 18, 20, 22 and 24 to 30 of DE 34482-S (2008-03-03, Alcance 19 to La Gaceta N° 80, 2008-04-25) and DAJ-RM-1151-08 |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Article 5 | Amends Article 34.2.4.1 of DE 37988-S: notification changes are 5 working days |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Article 6 | References to DE 34482-S in other decrees are read as references to this decree from the effective date |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Transitorio I | The BPM certificates of Articles 11.5, 16.5, 18.9.2, 18.11.1 and 18.16.3 are not mandatory before the national BPM regulation issues |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Transitorio II | Registered uses approved before entry into force remain valid until the original registration expires |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Transitorio III | Originally granted 6 months to complete labels (amended to 18 months in 2024) |
| Approving decree | DE 43902-S | Transitorio IV | The Ministry of Health must issue the BPM regulation for EMBs within 12 months of entry into force |
| 2024 amendment | MS-AJ-CB-200-2024 | Article 1 | Rewrites 4.7 (multi-country CLV), 10.20 (declaration letter where the CLV omits the holder), 17.3 (equivalence break completion) and 18.11.4 (origin change completion) |
| 2024 amendment | MS-AJ-CB-200-2024 | Article 2 | Transitorio III changed from 6 to 18 months, counted from entry into force of the regulation |
| 2024 amendment | MS-AJ-CB-200-2024 | Article 3; CONSIDERANDO 7° | In force from publication in the Official Gazette; public consultation of 10 working days from 2023-12-12 |
| Earlier source | DE 37988-S (2013-10-03, La Gaceta N° 203, 2013-10-22) | Article 34.2.4.1 | Regístrelo portal regulation; notification change deadline |
| Earlier source | DE 39342-S (2015-10-23) | Cited by Article 21 | National Technovigilance System Regulation |
| Earlier source | DE 24037-S (1994-12-22) | Cited by Article 11.6 | Authorisations related to ionising radiation sources |
3. Expert insights
Insight one: The main regulation uses a buffer of 6 months after publication. Article 7, Rige 6 meses después de su publicación, gave the industry a half-year adaptation period, during which the four transitional provisions handled BPM (Transitorio I), existing registered uses (Transitorio II), label completion (Transitorio III) and BPM rulemaking (Transitorio IV). This distinguishes the transition from an enter-into-force-on-publication approach. The formal text states no Gazette number or publication date, so this volume gives no calendar effective date.
Insight two: The legislative reasoning of the 2024 amendment is stated very directly. CONSIDERANDO 5° explains the motive for two changes: first, allowing the CLV to be issued by the authority of the country where the holder’s subsidiary is established or where the parent company’s subsidiary is established (the subsidiary must be legally established); second, clarifying that a registration relying on equivalence recognition can no longer rely on it once a CLV issued by a non-recognised authority is submitted, and the full documentation of Articles 11, 12 and 13 must then be submitted. CONSIDERANDO 6° explains that the label window was extended to keep label review from slowing post-registration changes.
Insight three: The extension of Transitorio III is a genuine load reduction. Under the original 6-month window, every dossier without a product label required a dedicated post-registration change; at 18 months, companies can fold label completion into routine changes and save one standalone application. The clock runs from entry into force of the regulation, not from publication of the amendment.
Insight four: Transitorio II resolved the legacy issue of old certificates. Registered uses (usos de registro) approved before entry into force remain valid until the original registration expires, so companies need not concentrate use re-examinations in the transition window; the real pressure point comes at renewal, when the Clase 3 and Clase 4 clinical evidence requirements of the new rules (Article 12.2) apply.
Insight five: BPM is the only unresolved item still counting down. Transitorio I defers the BPM certificate requirements of Articles 11.5, 16.5, 18.9.2, 18.11.1 and 18.16.3, and Transitorio IV requires the Ministry of Health to issue the BPM regulation within 12 months of entry into force. As of the verification date, whether it has been issued remains pending verification against the Ministry of Health’s current publications. The GRZAN regulatory team notes: deferral is not exemption. Once published, the requirement revives simultaneously at five entry points — initial registration (11.5), renewal (16.5) and manufacturer changes (18.9.2, 18.11.1, 18.16.3).
Insight six: Repeal and reference replacement were paired actions. Article 4 of the approving decree repeals the old regulation and the old equivalence procedure, and Article 6 replaces references to DE 34482-S in other decrees with references to the new decree. Old approvals and old equivalence documents should therefore be read under RTCR 505:2022 — their effect was not voided, but redirected.
4. Practical recommendations
- Reconcile historical approvals: for certificates issued under the pre-2022 regulation, confirm under Transitorio II that the registered uses remain valid until the original expiry, and schedule renewal under the new rules after expiry.
- Plan label completion within the 18-month window: where the dossier lacks labels, fold completion into the routine change plan; do not read the 18 months as permission to wait.
- Prepare for BPM on two tracks: obtain and file the target factory’s quality system certificate during the deferral so it can be used directly once published, avoiding submissions at five entry points.
- Rearrange the CLV plan after the 2024 amendment: for groups with capacity in several countries, choose the issuing country under the new 4.7 and confirm the subsidiary is legally established there; where the CLV omits the holder’s name, prepare the declaration letter under the new 10.20.
- Screen for equivalence-chain break risk: for equivalence-based registrations, check case by case whether the current CLV issuing country remains within recognition; where a supplier or site change would change the country of origin, prepare to first-registration standards under the new 18.11.4.
- Maintain annual tracking covering at least the BPM regulation, the recognition list, the official fee schedule and the Regístrelo portal form versions, all per current Ministry publications.
5. Verification checklist
- □ Historical approvals reconciled for use validity and expiry dates
- □ Renewal under the new rules (11 items of Article 16) scheduled for expiring certificates
- □ Dossiers missing labels covered by the 18-month completion window plan
- □ CLV issuing country and subsidiary legal establishment confirmed under the new 4.7
- □ Where the CLV omits the holder, the parent company declaration letter of the new 10.20 is prepared and legalised
- □ Equivalence chain-break risk screened case by case (new 17.3)
- □ Planned site changes altering the country of origin prepared under the new 18.11.4
- □ An alert for publication of the BPM regulation is in place, with quality system evidence interfaced
- □ An annual tracking list exists (BPM regulation, recognition list, fee schedule, portal form versions)
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the Costa Rican market. Our team manages Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Salud) sanitary registration applications, prepares Spanish-language dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us