Right to Sell Annual Fee of CAD 460 for Licensed Devices
Updated: 2026-11-11 · GRZAN Regulatory Team · Verification date 2026-10-20
1. Key takeaways
After obtaining an MDL, the holder must pay the Right to Sell annual fee each year. As of April 1, 2026, the fee is CAD 460 (CAD 452 in 2025). It applies to licensed Class II, III or IV devices and to authorised Class II, III or IV devices that are not UPHN devices; UPHN devices are not subject to the fee.
- The fee obligation arises every year for each licensed Class II to IV device, so annual cost scales with the size of the licence portfolio.
- Section 77(2) of the fee order defines who pays, tied to whether the licence is suspended under sections 40 or 41.
- UPHN devices are expressly excluded from the fee, a cost difference that follows the emergency authorisation path.
- The right-to-sell fee for MDL holders and the annual review fee for MDEL holders are separate obligations with different amounts and legal bases.
- The rate changed from CAD 452 in 2025 to CAD 460 in 2026, and the new rate applies from April 1, 2026.
2. Legal basis
The fee, who must pay it and the exclusion for UPHN devices all come from the fee order and the supporting Health Canada pages, summarised below.
| Regulation or document | Provisions | Dates | Source |
| Order Setting Out the Fees Payable for Drugs and Medical Devices | Section 77(1): annual right-to-sell fee; section 77(2): who pays (licence holder or authorisation holder; where the licence has not been suspended under sections 40 or 41) | SOR/2019-124 (as amended by SOR/2023-21, SOR/2023-278) | Justice Laws |
| Health Canada, right-to-sell fee page | CAD 460 (as of 2026-04-01); CAD 452 in 2025 | Verified in 2026 | canada.ca |
| Health Canada fees page | The annual right-to-sell fee is a continuing fee for Class II, III and IV devices | Published 2026-02-04 | canada.ca |
| Medical Devices Regulations | Sections 40, 41 (licence suspension) | SOR/98-282 | Justice Laws |
The fee sits at the intersection of the device licence system and the fee order: the licence determines that a device exists in the Class II to IV space, and section 77 converts each such device into an annual payment obligation with defined payer rules and a defined exclusion.
3. Expert insights
Insight 1: the payer is tied directly to whether the licence is suspended.
Under section 77(2), the fee is payable by the licence holder for a Class II, III or IV device (on the condition that the licence has not been suspended under sections 40 or 41 of the Medical Devices Regulations), or by the authorisation holder. Where the licence is suspended, the payer rules change accordingly. A company managing licences that could be suspended should therefore review the payer position whenever a suspension occurs, rather than assuming the invoicing arrangement carries over unchanged through the suspension period. Making this review a standing step in the suspension playbook costs nothing in normal years and closes the gap that opens the moment a suspension notice arrives mid-cycle.
Insight 2: UPHN devices are expressly excluded.
Section 77(1) applies to “licensed Class II, III or IV devices, or authorised Class II, III or IV devices that are not UPHN devices”. Read in reverse: UPHN devices are not subject to the right-to-sell annual fee. This is a cost difference attached to the emergency authorisation path. Companies holding authorised devices should therefore split their portfolio between licensed devices, which carry the annual fee, and UPHN devices, which do not, before building the annual budget rather than applying the fee uniformly across everything they hold. Getting this split right at the start of the budget cycle is far easier than unpicking it during finance review, when the mixed figures have already flowed into forecasts and reports.
Insight 3: the per-device basis of the fee means the portfolio size directly determines annual cost.
The annual fee covers the right to sell an individual licensed or authorised Class II to IV device. The more device licences a company holds, the more the annual cost accumulates device by device. Multi-product companies should build an annual cost model on the basis of the number of licences multiplied by CAD 460, and should treat portfolio pruning as a cost lever: every licence retained for a product that no longer ships is a recurring fee with no offsetting revenue.
Insight 4: the MDEL annual fee is a separate line.
The right-to-sell annual fee for MDL holders (CAD 460) and the annual review fee for MDEL holders (CAD 5,519) differ in payer, legal basis and amount, and must be budgeted and calendared separately. Although both run annually and both effectively cluster around the April 1 rate switch, they are not interchangeable items, and merging them into a single compliance line is a common source of budget confusion. The cleanest structure is two named recurring items in the compliance calendar, each with its own owner, its own legal reference and its own amount, reviewed together once a year but never netted or combined in reporting.
4. Practical recommendations
- Build the annual cost model on the number of licences multiplied by CAD 460, covering all Class II to IV licences.
- Exclude UPHN authorised devices from the right-to-sell fee budget.
- Set the calendar alongside the MDEL ALR (before April 1), but keep the two budget lines separate.
- Review the payer rules of section 77(2) whenever a licence is suspended.
- Verify the new year’s rate around April 1 each year.
5. Verification checklist
- □ The annual right-to-sell fee model is built per licence (CAD 460 per device)
- □ UPHN authorised devices are excluded from the right-to-sell fee budget
- □ The right-to-sell fee and the MDEL annual review fee are separate budget lines
- □ The payer rules in a licence suspension scenario have been reviewed
- □ An annual rate check around April 1 is in place
- □ Proof of payment is archived
Regulatory information verified as of October 28, 2026.
How GRZAN can help. GRZAN provides medical device and IVD registration, quality system, authorised representative and local testing support for the Canadian market. Our team manages Health Canada Medical Device Licence and MDEL applications, prepares risk-classified dossiers, and supports post-market vigilance obligations. Business enquiries: info@grzanglobal.com
Disclaimer
Prepared by GRZAN from publicly available regulation. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legislation and official fees are subject to change by the competent authority.
About GRZAN
GRZAN (Global Regulatory Zone Access Navigator) — the global market-access navigator for medical devices and IVDs.
GRZAN is a specialist consultancy for medical device and IVD market access, providing end-to-end regulatory solutions across the product lifecycle and making international market entry simpler and faster.
Key figures. More than 25 wholly owned subsidiaries worldwide covering 50+ countries and regions; chosen by 100+ listed and leading Chinese device manufacturers, with 4,000+ successful cases; 12+ years in the sector and 200+ regulatory training sessions and seminars delivered.
What we do. Global market access: multi-country registration programmes, technical documentation, regulatory advice. Clinical evidence: clinical evaluation reports (CER), usability studies, overseas clinical investigations. Quality systems: ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR and BGMP implementation and audit readiness. Authorised representative and licence-holder services across Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and North America.
Why GRZAN. A real operating entity, with the certificate held by the manufacturer: our direct overseas subsidiaries act as the compliant local holder, so the regulatory relationship stays clear and you keep control rather than being tied to a distributor. Direct access to the team: no time-zone gap, no language barrier, no cultural gap. Review points anticipated: we know what FDA 510(k), EU MDR, Southeast Asian, Latin American and Middle Eastern reviewers look for, which shortens timelines and reduces deficiency letters. Pathway planning: pre-decision analysis and risk assessment before you commit.
Every engagement rests on three commitments: efficiency through pre-submission review, certainty through a clear pathway, and stability through a licence-holder that stays in place.
Take your devices global with GRZAN
We work with manufacturers worldwide to open new markets with a clear regulatory pathway.
Contact us